タルパ思念体 総合掲示板

　　Thanks for your translation, the general meaning is correct, but some details may still need to be embellished for the sake of rigor.
　　
　　Yes, the classification is based on functionality, not on the nature of things. Because the latter requires a large number of objective experiments to give more scientific results, which we can not do at present. So I think this is the first stage of classification, it's for the future.
　　
　　It is more for the future contact with this kind of culture novice, as well as the public do not understand this kind of culture.
　　
　　Currently this definition is fairly broad, such as IF can also be incorporated into this classification. The aim is not to narrow the definition so that members of the previous community feel excluded. Second, it actually protects the original concept of tulpa, so that we can explore and study the essence of tulpa without interference from similar concepts.
　　
　　In short, the new taxonomy is only used by current community members to correct some of the less rigorous data. I'm sure you've seen the controversy over the old classification system.

　　So the new taxonomy may not make much sense to most members. Because it's more for beginners and the future.
　　
　　Eternal Beauty is a new concept to me. I've never heard of it. I need to look it up.
　　
　　ところでzeldashyu2さんはタルパを持たない人々への社会的な影響力について考えておられると思うんですが、
　　
　　I could not understand the following content of this sentence very well. Forgive me for confirming their meaning to you.