タルパ思念体 総合掲示板

　　Below I will give a relatively rigorous classification based on the information collected in the past six months and my personal experience as a Chinese community administrator for 2 years. I will not give nouns directly, just replace them with numbers:

　　
　　Category 1. After understanding the relevant tulpa literature, the practice of content, they created the final product. The tulpa literature here mainly refers to the original guide to the tulpa community. For example, the English community, the Russian community, and the guides displayed on the main websites of the Japanese community.
　　
　　Category 2. They don't know the information of the tulpa community, but they created a similar existence. The main difference between category 2 and category 1 is that they don't know the tulpa culture, they may only have similar information, in extreme cases they don't know anything, but take the approach that the tulpa community does.
　　
　　Category 3. After they contacted the relevant materials, they did not try or interrupted the attempt, but still produced results. The difference from categorization 1 is that, on the autonomy of the parties, the interval between the termination of creation and the generation of such "existence" must be at least three days. This situation can be considered as the party has no intention to complete in the heart.
　　
　　Category 4. They do not know the tulpa literature or relevant information, nor take the initiative to try similar practices, but still produce the "existence". Can be considered the "opposite" of category 2.It should be noted that category 3 and category 4 contain DID and other special cases. For example, the person may have different degrees of psychological trauma, or depression, etc. Since only the individual knows his/her own situation best, if his/her own situation conforms to classification 3 and 4, the party concerned needs to think more about his/her own health, and should not blindly consider himself/herself as one of these two categories.